Comments on: Windows 7 has been finally RTMed http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/ Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:35:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mat http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-225 Mat Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:41:25 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-225 What's the difference between 6.1.7600.16384 and 1638x (last one?) I'm using 16384 and having trouble with activation... What’s the difference between 6.1.7600.16384 and 1638x (last one?)

I’m using 16384 and having trouble with activation…

]]> By: syed http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-224 syed Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:53:35 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-224 Wait 3 days more..i'm downloading this version.. Wait 3 days more..i’m downloading this version..

]]> By: ASTRANGER http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-223 ASTRANGER Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:17:03 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-223 It's definitely and RTM, whether it is final or not is still up to Micro$oft It’s definitely and RTM, whether it is final or not is still up to Micro$oft

]]> By: Victor http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-222 Victor Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:35:32 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-222 not really sure, this version also expires on 10.02.2010, as the orbit activator says :) not really sure, this version also expires on 10.02.2010, as the orbit activator says :)

]]> By: think http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-221 think Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:29:32 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-221 16385 is indeed the final code but still is not hte final rtm as it needs some polishing to be done for eg the help files are not complete,all the icons have not been replaced with new one. so do you think that microsoft will release a product like this. so the final version is 16386 and you will hear the anouncement on 21st. there will will not be huge difference in 16835 and 16836 but only that 16386 will be the most polished with mall gaps filled. so even if you use 16385 it is ok but i will wait for 16386. 16385 is indeed the final code but still is not hte final rtm as it needs some polishing to be done for eg the help files are not complete,all the icons have not been replaced with new one.
so do you think that microsoft will release a product like this.
so the final version is 16386 and you will hear the anouncement on 21st.
there will will not be huge difference in 16835 and 16836 but only that 16386 will be the most polished with mall gaps filled.
so even if you use 16385 it is ok but i will wait for 16386.

]]> By: Aman http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-220 Aman Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:53:47 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-220 Is it really true? I mean do you have any proofs. I really wanted to download but waiting for final RTM. Is it really true? I mean do you have any proofs. I really wanted to download but waiting for final RTM.

]]> By: Jon Worrel http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed-159/#comment-219 Jon Worrel Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:00:58 +0000 http://win7.in/2009/windows-7-has-been-finally-rtmed/#comment-219 Hmm, so 7600 16385 is the final RTM, after being voted on by ~7,500 Microsoft partners. Hmm, so 7600 16385 is the final RTM, after being voted on by ~7,500 Microsoft partners.

]]>